Adding AI Agents to Your Org-Chart: the First Step Towards Responsible AI
AI Agents are more than tools, they're teammates
This is my daily post. I write daily but send my newsletter to your email only on Sundays. Go HERE to see my past newsletters.
We are entering the era of AI Agents who won’t just support work but perform it, taking over roles held by humans or working alongside them, and they deserve a spot on the org chart.
This raises the real question of whether companies are ready to transition to turning AI agents into new employees.
In favor of this transition is the simple observation: what do managers feel more responsible for, a machine or an employee?
The biggest leap we can take in recognizing AI agents is to anthropromorphize them as teammates that work alongside humans.
This fuels a more positive integration of agents in the workplace, enhances productivity, and in some cases, helps employees define exactly how agents will work alongside them.
Recognizing them on the org chart is a key step in their adoption and responsible use.
Their chart position will depend on the work they do.
If task-based and tied to working alongside humans, they may form human-agentic teams, while agents that mirror an existing role, say a customer agent, may be seen as independent entities.
Putting an agent on an org chart is anything but trivial or trite.
It has big ethical consequences, particularly in holding managers responsible and accountable for their output.
Responsible AI is sadly seen as an afterthought for many companies.
A recent study showed that 60% of organizations hadn’t even identified key AI governance stakeholders or owners.
Putting an AI Agent on an org chart establishes clear ownership and a duty of care by the managers.
They will need to establish that the agent has a clear role, train teammates to work with it, and monitor its progress, all key elements of responsible AI use.
If the simple act of putting an AI agent on an org chart will make companies more responsible, I’m all for it!
👉Determining Agentic ROI
This paper had a great explanation of how to calculate the ROI of an agentic AI system. This is a critical calculation, and this is one of the better analyses I’ve seen to date.
That’s why I’m sharing in totality below:
🔹 A Four-Axis Framework for True Value Assessment
To ensure no value is overlooked, the “return” side of the equation can be structured using the holistic four-axis framework proposed by Meimandi et al. (2025). This balanced approach ensures all dimensions of performance are considered.
🔹 Axis 1: Economic Value (The Bottom Line)
This is the pillar of direct financial impact, where rigorous modeling is key. Instead of static estimates, organizations should adopt the dynamic techniques proposed by Pandey et al., including the following: ׁ
-Modeling a spectrum of outcomes with sensitivity analysis to prepare for best-case, worst-case, and most-likely scenarios. ׁ
-Quantifying direct returns such as labor cost savings, increased sales from personalization, and reduced expenses from error mitigation.
🔹 Axis 2: Technical & Operational Performance (Efficiency Gains)
This axis measures how the agent improves the engine of the business. ׁ
-Increased Throughput: Processing invoices, tickets, or reports at a scale and speed unattainable by manual processes. ׁ
-Enhanced Availability: Providing 24-7 operational capacity, reducing customer wait times, and ensuring business continuity. ׁ
-Improved Asset Utilization: Optimizing schedules and resource allocation in logistics and manufacturing to maximize existing assets.
🔹 Axis 3: User Impact and Adoption (The Human Element)
As Kopyto and Wachnik (2025) argue, financial models are incomplete without qualitative insights. This axis provides the essential context for why an AI agent succeeds or fails. AI Agents As Employees. ׁ
-Employee Satisfaction: Freeing employees from mundane work to focus on strategic tasks boosts morale and reduces turnover. ׁ
-Customer Satisfaction (CSAT): Faster, more accurate, and personalized service drives loyalty and increases customer lifetime value. ׁ
-Adoption Rates and Cultural Readiness: Measuring team integration and acceptance is a primary indicator of long-term success and financial returns.
🔹 Axis 4: Safety, Ethics, and Strategic Value (Long-Term Advantage)
This forward-looking pillar assesses an agent’s contribution to resilience, responsibility, and future growth. ׁ
-Enhanced Decision-Making: Extracting critical insights from vast datasets to inform smarter corporate strategy. ׁ
-Innovation Capacity: Giving teams the time and tools to develop new products, services, and business models. ׁ
-Risk Mitigation and Compliance: Monitoring for fraud, bias, or regulatory non-compliance, building trust, and reducing liability.
HAND CURATED FOR YOU
🚀 Every week I scan thousands of articles to find only the best and most valuable for you. Subscribe to get my expertly curated news straight to your inbox each week. Free is good but paid is better.
If you know someone who would like this newsletter, please share it with them and help grow our Asia, CBDC, and AI aficionados community!
