Understand the AI Bubble: Look to Historic Tech Revolutions
Goldman says AI and tech are not bubbles, but history disagrees.
Goldman Sachs declares that there is no AI bubble, but history disagrees with this assessment as Goldman takes a second look at AI.
This paper reads like an apology tour for a recently published paper that was highly critical of AI! (See below)
Did Goldman’s big tech clients complain?
It still is a FABULOUS read that covers almost 600 years of new technologies back to the printing press. Goldman shows that world-changing technologies may create bubbles and generate relatively small returns for investors compared to those generated by the new innovations and industries that follow.
Researchers found that for new technologies, “excitement often turns into an obsessive fervor with investors clambering to get exposure to the theme at any price. That’s when bubbles emerge and, eventually, burst. A recent study found that in a sample of 51 major tech innovations introduced between 1825 and 2000, bubbles in equity prices were evident in 73% of cases.”
READ THE ORIGINAL RESEARCH REPORT CRITICAL OF AI HERE:
👉TAKEAWAYS
The technology sector has generated 32% of the Global equity return and 40% of the US equity market return since 2010. This has reflected stronger fundamentals rather than irrational exuberance.
In our view, the technology sector is not in a bubble and is likely to continue to dominate returns.
However, concentration risks are high and investors should look to diversify exposure to improve risk-adjusted returns while also gaining access to
potential winners in smaller technology companies and other parts of the market,
including in the old economy, which will enjoy the growth of more infrastructure
spend.
Historically, investors over-focus on the originators, understate the impact of competition and overstate the returns on capital invested by the early innovators.
At the same time, investors tend to underestimate the growth of new entrants to the industry that can piggyback off the capex of others, enabling them to generate new products and services.
While the protective ‘moats’ around the current AI winners are significant, and valuations are not bubble-like, the number of new patents in this area is growing rapidly, suggesting that new competitors will emerge and costs will come down.
While the hyper-scalers have huge scale and ability to invest in proprietary AI models, cheaper open source alternatives are emerging at a very rapid rate.
Innovation has a profound impact on even the largest companies. As the Fortune 500 demonstrates, many with dominant market caps and near monopoly power have fallen.
👊STRAIGHT TALK👊
Goldman goes out of its way to ensure readers that tech stocks and AI are not bubbles while citing statistics showing that most disruptive technology (73%) historically creates bubbles.
If this seems contradictory, I agree, and I believe the historical data more than I do Goldman’s analysts.
Then Goldman gives themselves the ultimate way out if investors lose money in AI:
“The infrastructure left behind in the wake of the initial investor surge and capex leads to the emergence of new products and services. These are often underestimated or poorly anticipated.”
This may be true, but it is of little solace to “initial” investors in Radio, Telegraph, and Canals who lost their shirts!
AI investors today are taking that same risk and are hard-pressed to understand what AI infrastructure will be “left behind.”
AI will be transformational, but many investors will likely be in the 73% bubble club.
Thoughts?
You made it this far, so subscribe! Here are the six benefits waiting for you when you subscribe:
Save time: Get the expert insights on Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC), AI, Payments, and Financial Inclusion that you need to stay ahead of the curve, all delivered directly to your inbox weekly;
Know the future and profit: Get real payback from a unique point of view directly from Asia that focuses on how the region is “leapfrogging” the West and showing you the future;
Be prepared: CBDCs are no longer theoretical but coming soon, so keep up with the latest developments on the digital euro, yuan, sterling and dollar;
Manage your personal AI risk: Don’t be disrupted; be the disruptor. In-depth analysis of how our AI revolution impacts finance so that you can be in front of this great transformation, not behind it;
Stay objective, avoid hype: My writing doesn’t follow corporate diktats. It’s a message that doesn’t conform with mainstream media and is gritty, practical, hype-free, and, on occasion, controversial;
Stay safe: My writing is trusted by nearly 60,000 executives, innovators, investors, policymakers, journalists, academics, and open-minded crypto hodlers daily.
Readers like you make my work possible! Subscribing is free, but I am honored when readers opt for a paid subscription to recognize my high-quality writing and help keep it flowing. Thank you!
Sponsor Cashless and reach a targeted audience of over 60,000 fintech and CBDC aficionados who would love to know more about what you do!
I personally think we are in a bubble simply for the fact that current AI systems literally take no account for the experience of the human operator, always just focusing on new features, faster generation, things like that. At some point, we as humans just grow weary of its use, and then we experience fatigue with the technology, and following we simply start to ignore it. We have seen this time and time again.
People are starting to experience AI Fatigue as a legitimate phenomenon. As someone who is starting to experience it myself (I don’t want AI in my washing machine thank you very much) I have found a few case studies into researching my own conditions into it.
AI Fatigue: A Study into the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Employee Fatigue
https://www.amazon.com//dp/B0D2BQV1DC
there are a couple others too, but just my two cents.